Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AltriskAltrisk
VS
Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)
Altrisk

Altrisk

22 Oxford Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, ZA

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hollard.co.za
751/1000Fair

Altrisk is a specialist long term risk product provider. Our reputation has been built around our superior underwriting expertise. This, coupled with an uncomplicated yet comprehensive product range in the area of life, disability and dread disease benefits, has resulte...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:88
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)

Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)

Schottenring 30, Vienna, 1010, AT

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://group.vig/
778/1000Fair

Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) is the leading insurance group in the entire Central and Eastern European (CEE) region. More than 50 insurance companies and pension funds in 30 countries form a Group with a long-standing tradition, strong brands and close customer relation...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:17,025
Subsidiaries:41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Altrisk

Altrisk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)

Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Altrisk in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Altrisk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Altrisk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Altrisk

Altrisk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)

Vienna Insurance Group (VIG)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Altrisk company and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Altrisk company and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Altrisk company and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Altrisk company and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Altrisk company and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Altrisk company and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Altrisk company and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Altrisk company and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Altrisk company and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Altrisk company and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Altrisk company and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Altrisk and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Altrisk and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Altrisk or Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Altrisk or Vienna Insurance Group (VIG) ?
Between Altrisk and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Altrisk and Vienna Insurance Group (VIG), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1