Comparison Overview
Altmetric for Research and Development

Altmetric for Research and Development
90 York Way, London, GB
Last Update: 27/02/2026
Your key stakeholders (from investors to patients to customers) are engaging 24/7 with journal articles, clinical trials, data, posters, and presentations from corporate and research entities globally. Altmetric tracks the online shares and commentary to provide critic...

Pitney Bowes
27 Waterview Dr, Shelton, 06484, US
Last Update: 29/04/2026
Pitney Bowes is a technology-driven company that provides digital shipping solutions, mailing innovation, and financial services to clients around the world – including more than 90 percent of the Fortune 500. Small businesses to large enterprises, and government entiti...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Altmetric for Research and Development







Pitney Bowes






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Altmetric for Research and Development in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Pitney Bowes has 183.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Altmetric for Research and Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Altmetric for Research and Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Pitney Bowes (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pitney Bowes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Altmetric for Research and Development

Pitney Bowes
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.