Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AlpitronicAlpitronic
VS
EatonEaton
Alpitronic

Alpitronic

Bozner-Boden-Mitterweg 33, Bozen, BZ, IT, 39100

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
746/1000Moderate

Leading the way in development and deployment of efficient, reliable, DC fast-charging technology, Alpitronic is driven to shape a sustainable, electric future.

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:744
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Eaton

Eaton

30 Pembroke Road, Dublin, Ireland, IE, 4

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.eaton.com
824/1000Good

Eaton is an intelligent power management company dedicated to improving the quality of life and protecting the environment for people everywhere. We are guided by our commitment to do business right, to operate sustainably and to help our customers manage power ─ today ...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:54,482
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Alpitronic

Alpitronic

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Eaton

Eaton

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Alpitronic has 51.69% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eaton in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Alpitronic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alpitronic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Eaton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eaton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Alpitronic

Alpitronic

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ALPCOA1769923964
Eaton

Eaton

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Alpitronic company and Eaton company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Alpitronic company and Eaton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Alpitronic company and Eaton company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Alpitronic company and Eaton company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Alpitronic company and Eaton company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Alpitronic company and Eaton company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Alpitronic company and Eaton company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Alpitronic company and Eaton company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Alpitronic company and Eaton company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Alpitronic company and Eaton company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Alpitronic company and Eaton company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Alpitronic and Eaton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Alpitronic and Eaton, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Alpitronic or Eaton ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Alpitronic or Eaton ?
Between Alpitronic and Eaton, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Alpitronic and Eaton, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2