Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ALPHV TechnologiesALPHV Technologies
VS
Orange BusinessOrange Business
ALPHV Technologies

ALPHV Technologies

Tower B, The Vertical Corporate Towers, 8, Jalan Kerinchi, Bangsar South, 59200 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Bangsar South, 59200, MY

Last Update: 04/05/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://alphv.com
400/1000Critical

ALPHV Technologies (formerly known as alphatechlabs) has 4 pillars of offerings: 1. Tech* Development/Project Management/Consultation 2. Tech* Training/Education/Mentorship 3. Developer Relations/Marketing 4. Corporate Innovation (Hackathons) *Tech encompasses of the ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Orange Business

Orange Business

La Plaine Saint Denis, Paris, FR, 93457 Cedex

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
781/1000Fair

At Orange Business, our ambition is to become the leading european Network and Digital Integrator by leveraging our proven expertise in next-generation connectivity solutions, the cloud and cybersecurity. Our 30,000 women and men are present in 65 countries, where ever...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:28,510
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ALPHV Technologies

ALPHV Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Orange Business

Orange Business

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

ALPHV Technologies has 32.89% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orange Business in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ALPHV Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALPHV Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Orange Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ALPHV Technologies

ALPHV Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ALP1777732038
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
WSTALP1777890334
Orange Business

Orange Business

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ORA957082125

FAQ

Between ALPHV Technologies company and Orange Business company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ALPHV Technologies company and Orange Business company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ALPHV Technologies company and Orange Business company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ALPHV Technologies company and Orange Business company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ALPHV Technologies company and Orange Business company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ALPHV Technologies company and Orange Business company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ALPHV Technologies company and Orange Business company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ALPHV Technologies company and Orange Business company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ALPHV Technologies company and Orange Business company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ALPHV Technologies company and Orange Business company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ALPHV Technologies company and Orange Business company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ALPHV Technologies and Orange Business, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ALPHV Technologies and Orange Business, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ALPHV Technologies or Orange Business ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ALPHV Technologies or Orange Business ?
Between ALPHV Technologies and Orange Business, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ALPHV Technologies and Orange Business, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9