Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLCAlpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC
VS
StrykerStryker
Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC

Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC

2070 N Cessna Road, Warsaw, 46582, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.alpha-mfg.com
621/1000Poor

Alpha Manufacturing is an ISO 13485 full service contract manufacturer specializing in highly engineered and complex surgical devices for spine, trauma, hip, and knee applications. Utilizing the latest in process technology, Alpha Manufacturing partners with customers t...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:8
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Stryker

Stryker

2825 Airview Boulevard, Kalamazoo, 49002, US

Last Update: 08/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.stryker.com
477/1000Critical

Stryker is a global leader in medical technologies and, together with our customers, we are driven to make healthcare better. We offer innovative products and services in MedSurg, Neurotechnology and Orthopaedics that help improve patient and healthcare outcomes. Alongs...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:51,473
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
14
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC

Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stryker

Stryker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Stryker has 1220.75% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stryker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stryker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC

Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ALP850050725
Stryker

Stryker

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1779337852
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1779452900
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DOWSTR1775838732

FAQ

Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC company and Stryker company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC company and Stryker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC company and Stryker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC company and Stryker company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC company and Stryker company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC company and Stryker company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC company and Stryker company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC and Stryker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC and Stryker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC or Stryker ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC or Stryker ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC and Stryker, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Alpha Manufacturing & Design, LLC and Stryker, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2