Comparison Overview
Alorica

Alorica
5161 California Ave, Suite 100, Irvine, CA, US, 92617
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We’re passionate about creating customers for life by designing experiences that elevate your brand. As your full-service CX partner from strategy to execution, we blend proven performance, industry-leading expertise and the right technology that delivers real results a...

ResultsCX
1700 Markley St, Suite 210, Norristown, Pennsylvania, US, 19401
Last Update: 05/04/2026
ResultsCX is a leading provider of transformational Customer Experience Management (CXM) solutions to 75+ global brands, including Fortune 100 and 500 companies. For 30+ years, we have been driving superior customer and business outcomes for brands across Healthcare, Me...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Alorica







ResultsCX






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Alorica in 2026.
Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ResultsCX in 2026.
Incident History - Alorica (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Alorica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ResultsCX (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ResultsCX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Alorica

ResultsCX
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.