Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AlmavivA de BelgiqueAlmavivA de Belgique
VS
SONDASONDA
AlmavivA de Belgique

AlmavivA de Belgique

Rue du Commerce 31, Brussels, 1000, BE

Last Update: 17/02/2026

View Profile

AlmavivA de Belgique is a Belgian IT company, a branch of the AlmavivA Group , created purposely to satisfy the needs of customers in Belgium, Luxembourg and the entire EU. The AlmavivA group is the largest supplier of Information & Communication Technology in Italy, w...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:28
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SONDA

SONDA

Teatinos 500, Santiago, CL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sonda.com
794/1000Fair

We are at the forefront of digital transformation in the Americas, positively impacting the lives of over 500 million people. As a key player in emerging industries, we drive innovation and change through ambitious modernization projects and cutting-edge solutions. By u...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:14,805
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AlmavivA de Belgique

AlmavivA de Belgique

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SONDA

SONDA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AlmavivA de Belgique in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SONDA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AlmavivA de Belgique (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AlmavivA de Belgique cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SONDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SONDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AlmavivA de Belgique

AlmavivA de Belgique

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SONDA

SONDA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AlmavivA de Belgique company and SONDA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique company and SONDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique company and SONDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique company and SONDA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique company and SONDA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique company and SONDA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique company and SONDA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique and SONDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique and SONDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AlmavivA de Belgique or SONDA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AlmavivA de Belgique or SONDA ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique and SONDA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AlmavivA de Belgique and SONDA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA