Comparison Overview

Allstate

VS

Sedgwick

Allstate

3100 Sanders Rd, None, Northbrook, Illinois, US, 60062
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://al.st/WelcomeLI

At Allstate, we're advocates for peace of mind and a good life. And that comes through in everything we do. From building innovative teams that truly understand our customers' needs, to challenging each other to develop our careers in a meaningful way, and finally to the incredible results we're able to achieve together. See how we’re creating a better future through innovation, advocacy, and empowering people and communities.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 58,885
Subsidiaries: 23
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Sedgwick

US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sedgwick.com

Sedgwick is the world’s leading risk and claims administration partner, helping clients thrive by navigating the unexpected. The company’s expertise, combined with the most advanced AI-enabled technology available, sets the standard for solutions in claims administration, loss adjusting, benefits administration and product recall. With over 33,000 colleagues and 10,000 clients across 80 countries, Sedgwick provides unmatched perspective, caring that counts, and solutions for the rapidly changing and complex risk landscape.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 21,657
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allstate.jpeg
Allstate
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sedgwick.jpeg
Sedgwick
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allstate
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sedgwick
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

Allstate has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sedgwick in 2025.

Incident History — Allstate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allstate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sedgwick (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sedgwick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allstate.jpeg
Allstate
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2020
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sedgwick.jpeg
Sedgwick
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sedgwick company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allstate company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Allstate company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Sedgwick company.

In the current year, Allstate company has reported more cyber incidents than Sedgwick company.

Neither Sedgwick company nor Allstate company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Sedgwick company and Allstate company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Sedgwick company nor Allstate company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Allstate company nor Sedgwick company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allstate nor Sedgwick holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Allstate company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sedgwick company.

Allstate company employs more people globally than Sedgwick company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Allstate nor Sedgwick holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allstate nor Sedgwick holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allstate nor Sedgwick holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allstate nor Sedgwick holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allstate nor Sedgwick holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allstate nor Sedgwick holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References