Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR)Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR)
VS
IntactIntact
Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR)

Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR)

37, Bd Abdellatif Ben Kaddour, Casablanca, 20000, MA

Last Update: 19/04/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

Allianz Trade est le leader mondial de l'assurance-crédit entreprise et un spécialiste reconnu dans les domaines du recouvrement, du financement structuré et du risque politique. Notre réseau d'informations propriétaire repose sur un accès instantané aux données de 28...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:51
Subsidiaries:130
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Intact

Intact

700 University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 0A1, CA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

We created a purpose-driven company based on Values and a belief that insurance is about people, not things. This is the foundation on which we have built Intact and it lives every day through our purpose, Values, what we aim to achieve and how. ___ Nous sommes là pour...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:20,853
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR)

Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Intact

Intact

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intact in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Intact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR)

Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Intact

Intact

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) company and Intact company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) company and Intact company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) company and Intact company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) company and Intact company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) company and Intact company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) company and Intact company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) company and Intact company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) and Intact, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) and Intact, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) or Intact ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) or Intact ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) and Intact, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Allianz Trade au Maroc (par Euler Hermes ACMAR) and Intact, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1