Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Allianz Partners TürkiyeAllianz Partners Türkiye
VS
Rentokil TerminixRentokil Terminix
Allianz Partners Türkiye

Allianz Partners Türkiye

Altunizade Mahallesi Kısıklı Caddesi No:47 , Istanbul, 34662, TR

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
772/1000Fair

Allianz Partners Turkey has been operating in Turkey as Allianz Global Assistance since 2014 and Allianz Partners Turkey as of 2016, under the roof of Allianz Group and as a part of Allianz Partners group since March of 1997. Our company develops tailored services to t...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:86
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rentokil Terminix

Rentokil Terminix

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

The Rentokil and Terminix family of brands have come together to form the world’s leading pest control company. With our shared vision, we’ll be expanding our products, services, and technology. And with our combined resources, we’ll do more to power innovation and deve...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:12,740
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Allianz Partners Türkiye

Allianz Partners Türkiye

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rentokil Terminix

Rentokil Terminix

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Partners Türkiye in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rentokil Terminix in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Allianz Partners Türkiye (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Partners Türkiye cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rentokil Terminix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rentokil Terminix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Allianz Partners Türkiye

Allianz Partners Türkiye

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rentokil Terminix

Rentokil Terminix

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
REN237072725

FAQ

Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Rentokil Terminix company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Rentokil Terminix company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Rentokil Terminix company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Rentokil Terminix company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Rentokil Terminix company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Rentokil Terminix company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Rentokil Terminix company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Rentokil Terminix company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Rentokil Terminix company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Rentokil Terminix company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Rentokil Terminix company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye and Rentokil Terminix, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye and Rentokil Terminix, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Allianz Partners Türkiye or Rentokil Terminix ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Allianz Partners Türkiye or Rentokil Terminix ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye and Rentokil Terminix, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye and Rentokil Terminix, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1