Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Allianz Partners TürkiyeAllianz Partners Türkiye
VS
Fosun 复星Fosun 复星
Allianz Partners Türkiye

Allianz Partners Türkiye

Altunizade Mahallesi Kısıklı Caddesi No:47 , Istanbul, 34662, TR

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
772/1000Fair

Allianz Partners Turkey has been operating in Turkey as Allianz Global Assistance since 2014 and Allianz Partners Turkey as of 2016, under the roof of Allianz Group and as a part of Allianz Partners group since March of 1997. Our company develops tailored services to t...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:86
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fosun 复星

Fosun 复星

600, ZHONGSHAN NO.2 ROAD(E) SHANGHAI, 200010 PRC, Shanghai, CN, 200010

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fosun.com
789/1000Fair

Fosun was founded in 1992. After more than 30 years of development, Fosun has become a global innovation-driven consumer group. Adhering to the mission of creating happier lives for families worldwide, Fosun is committed to creating a global happiness ecosystem fulfilli...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:17,419
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Allianz Partners Türkiye

Allianz Partners Türkiye

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fosun 复星

Fosun 复星

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Partners Türkiye in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fosun 复星 in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Allianz Partners Türkiye (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Partners Türkiye cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fosun 复星 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fosun 复星 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Allianz Partners Türkiye

Allianz Partners Türkiye

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fosun 复星

Fosun 复星

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Fosun 复星 company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Fosun 复星 company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Fosun 复星 company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Fosun 复星 company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Fosun 复星 company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Fosun 复星 company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Fosun 复星 company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Fosun 复星 company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Fosun 复星 company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Fosun 复星 company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye company and Fosun 复星 company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye and Fosun 复星, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye and Fosun 复星, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Allianz Partners Türkiye or Fosun 复星 ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Allianz Partners Türkiye or Fosun 复星 ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye and Fosun 复星, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Allianz Partners Türkiye and Fosun 复星, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA