Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Allianz MéxicoAllianz México
VS
China Pacific Insurance CompanyChina Pacific Insurance Company
Allianz México

Allianz México

Boulevard Manuel Ávila Camacho 164, Miguel Hidalgo, CDMX, 11650, MX

Last Update: 24/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.allianz.com.mx
756/1000Fair

Grupo Allianz fue fundado en Alemania en 1890, desde esa fecha comenzó a labrarse un camino de éxitos y constante crecimiento, logrando ser hoy en día una de las compañías líderes a nivel mundial en el sector asegurador, ofreciendo productos en seguros y administración ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:791
Subsidiaries:107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
China Pacific Insurance Company

China Pacific Insurance Company

银城中路190号, 浦东新区, 200120, CN

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cpic.com.cn/
811/1000Good

China Pacific Life Insurance Co., Ltd (CPIC Life in short) was formed on the basis of life insurance business of China Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd., which was founded on May 13th 1991, and is held by CPIC Group. The company was incorporated in November 11, 2001, headquar...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:24,963
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Allianz México

Allianz México

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
China Pacific Insurance Company

China Pacific Insurance Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz México in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Pacific Insurance Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Allianz México (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz México cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - China Pacific Insurance Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Pacific Insurance Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Allianz México

Allianz México

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
China Pacific Insurance Company

China Pacific Insurance Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Allianz México company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Allianz México company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Allianz México company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Allianz México company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Allianz México company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Allianz México company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Allianz México company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Allianz México company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz México company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz México company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Allianz México company and China Pacific Insurance Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Allianz México and China Pacific Insurance Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Allianz México and China Pacific Insurance Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Allianz México or China Pacific Insurance Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Allianz México or China Pacific Insurance Company ?
Between Allianz México and China Pacific Insurance Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Allianz México and China Pacific Insurance Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1