Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Allianz Darta SavingAllianz Darta Saving
VS
Allianz PartnersAllianz Partners
Allianz Darta Saving

Allianz Darta Saving

Temple Road, Blackrock, IE

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.allianzdarta.ie/
750/1000Fair

Allianz Darta Saving, the trade name of Darta Saving Life Assurance dac, is a life insurance company incorporated under Irish law, headquartered in Dublin and established in March 2003. It is authorized to operate in the Italian market under the “Freedom to Provide Serv...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:69
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Allianz Partners

Allianz Partners

Eurosquare 2, Saint-Ouen, 93400, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
778/1000Fair

Allianz Partners is a world leader in B2B2C insurance and assistance, offering global solutions that span international health and life, travel insurance, automotive and assistance. Customer driven, our innovative experts are redefining insurance services by delivering ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:12,294
Subsidiaries:107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Allianz Darta Saving

Allianz Darta Saving

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Allianz Partners

Allianz Partners

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Darta Saving in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Partners in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Allianz Darta Saving (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Darta Saving cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Allianz Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Allianz Darta Saving

Allianz Darta Saving

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Allianz Partners

Allianz Partners

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Allianz Darta Saving company and Allianz Partners company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving company and Allianz Partners company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving company and Allianz Partners company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving company and Allianz Partners company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving company and Allianz Partners company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving company and Allianz Partners company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving and Allianz Partners, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving and Allianz Partners, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Allianz Darta Saving or Allianz Partners ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Allianz Darta Saving or Allianz Partners ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving and Allianz Partners, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Allianz Darta Saving and Allianz Partners, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA