Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Allianz pojišťovna Česká republikaAllianz pojišťovna Česká republika
VS
IAGIAG
Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika

Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika

Ke Štvanici 656/8, Praha 8 - Karlín, 18600, CZ

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Staňte se součástí týmu, který dělá velké věci. Jsme silným, stabilním a vyhledávaným zaměstnavatelem. Jsme největší pojišťovnou na světě již 125 let, naše značka patří mezi globálně 55 nehodnotnějších. Ve více než 70 zemích se našich 144 tisíc zaměstnanců stará o 83 mi...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:590
Subsidiaries:107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IAG

IAG

201 Sussex St, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 04/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.iag.com.au
786/1000Fair

IAG is Australia and New Zealand's largest general insurance company with a purpose to make your world a safer place, whether you are a customer, partner, employee, shareholder or part of the communities IAG serves across Australia and New Zealand. Our businesses have ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:12,823
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika

Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IAG

IAG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IAG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IAG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika

Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IAG

IAG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and IAG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and IAG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and IAG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and IAG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and IAG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and IAG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and IAG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and IAG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and IAG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and IAG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and IAG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika and IAG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika and IAG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika or IAG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika or IAG ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika and IAG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika and IAG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA