Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Allianz pojišťovna Česká republikaAllianz pojišťovna Česká republika
VS
GallagherGallagher
Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika

Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika

Ke Štvanici 656/8, Praha 8 - Karlín, 18600, CZ

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Staňte se součástí týmu, který dělá velké věci. Jsme silným, stabilním a vyhledávaným zaměstnavatelem. Jsme největší pojišťovnou na světě již 125 let, naše značka patří mezi globálně 55 nehodnotnějších. Ve více než 70 zemích se našich 144 tisíc zaměstnanců stará o 83 mi...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:590
Subsidiaries:107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Gallagher

Gallagher

2850 Golf Road, Rolling Meadows, 60008, US

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
772/1000Fair

Gallagher, a global insurance brokerage, risk management, and consulting firm, serves communities around the globe, helping clients address risk, protecting assets, and recovering from losses. The products and services we provide keep businesses and institutions running...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:46,421
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika

Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Gallagher

Gallagher

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gallagher in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Gallagher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gallagher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika

Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Gallagher

Gallagher

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAL24413322
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAL849072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAL049072425

FAQ

Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and Gallagher company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and Gallagher company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and Gallagher company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and Gallagher company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika company and Gallagher company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika and Gallagher, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika and Gallagher, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika or Gallagher ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika or Gallagher ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika and Gallagher, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Allianz pojišťovna Česká republika and Gallagher, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8