Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAIAlliance Laundry Systems EMEAI
VS
ITWITW
Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI

Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI

Místecká 1116, Pribor, 742 58, CZ

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://alliancelaundry.com
745/1000Moderate

At Alliance Laundry Systems, our family of brands offers solutions to a worldwide customer base through the delivery of laundry products and services. Our corporate focus of putting the customer first drives our commercial quality product development strategy, marketi...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ITW

ITW

155 Harlem Avenue, Glenview, 60025, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
811/1000Good

ITW (NYSE: ITW) is a Fortune 300 global multi-industrial manufacturing leader with revenue of $15.9 billion in 2024. The company’s seven industry-leading segments leverage the unique ITW Business Model to drive solid growth with best-in-class margins and returns in mark...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:18,300
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI

Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ITW

ITW

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITW in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ITW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI

Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ITW

ITW

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI company and ITW company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI company and ITW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI company and ITW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI company and ITW company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI company and ITW company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI company and ITW company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI company and ITW company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI company and ITW company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI company and ITW company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI company and ITW company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI company and ITW company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI and ITW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI and ITW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI or ITW ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI or ITW ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI and ITW, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Alliance Laundry Systems EMEAI and ITW, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2