Comparison Overview

Alimentation Couche-Tard

VS

Genesco

Alimentation Couche-Tard

4204 Boulevard Industriel, Laval, Quebec, CA, H7L 0E3
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSX: ATD.A ATD.B) (“Couche-Tard”) Tard is the leader in the Canadian convenience store industry. In the United States, it is the largest independent convenience store operator in terms of the number of company-operated stores. Alimentation Couche-Tard exploits over 16,000 stores in 27 countries and over 133,000 people are employed in its network worldwide. In Europe, Couche-Tard is a leader in convenience store and road transportation fuel retail in the Scandinavian countries (Norway, Sweden and Denmark), in the Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania), as well as in Ireland, and has an important presence in Poland. Couche-Tard also offers other products, including aviation fuel and energy for stationary engines. In addition, under licensing agreements, approximately 2,250 stores are operated under the Circle K banner in 16 other countries and territories (Cambodia, China, Costa Rica, Egypt, Guam, Honduras, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Jamaica, Macau, Mexico, Mongolia, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Vietnam).

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 375
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Genesco

535 Marriott Dr, Nashville, Tennessee, US, 37214
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Genesco is a footwear focused specialty retailer and branded company with more than 1,400 stores in the U.S., Canada, the U.K. and Republic of Ireland. We also sell footwear at wholesale under the Johnston & Murphy brand, and through licensing agreements under the Levi’s, Dockers, Bass and other footwear brands. Today our portfolio of brands ranges from fashion footwear with an attitude to timeless brands.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 10,313
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alimentation-couche-tard.jpeg
Alimentation Couche-Tard
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genesco.jpeg
Genesco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alimentation Couche-Tard
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Genesco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alimentation Couche-Tard in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genesco in 2025.

Incident History — Alimentation Couche-Tard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alimentation Couche-Tard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Genesco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genesco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alimentation-couche-tard.jpeg
Alimentation Couche-Tard
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genesco.jpeg
Genesco
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alimentation Couche-Tard company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Genesco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Alimentation Couche-Tard company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Genesco company has not reported any.

In the current year, Genesco company and Alimentation Couche-Tard company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Genesco company nor Alimentation Couche-Tard company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Genesco company nor Alimentation Couche-Tard company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Alimentation Couche-Tard company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Genesco company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Alimentation Couche-Tard company nor Genesco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alimentation Couche-Tard nor Genesco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Genesco company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard company.

Genesco company employs more people globally than Alimentation Couche-Tard company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Alimentation Couche-Tard nor Genesco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alimentation Couche-Tard nor Genesco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alimentation Couche-Tard nor Genesco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alimentation Couche-Tard nor Genesco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alimentation Couche-Tard nor Genesco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alimentation Couche-Tard nor Genesco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H