Comparison Overview

Aligned Data Centers

VS

Conduent

Aligned Data Centers

Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Aligned Data Centers is a leading technology infrastructure company offering innovative, sustainable, and adaptive Scale Data Centers and Build-to-Scale solutions for global hyperscale and enterprise customers

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 293
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Conduent

100 Campus Dr, None, Florham Park, New Jersey, US, 07932
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 0 and 549

Conduent delivers digital business solutions and services spanning the commercial, government and transportation spectrum – creating valuable outcomes for its clients and the millions of people who count on them. We leverage cloud computing, artificial intelligence, machine learning, automation and advanced analytics to deliver mission-critical solutions. Through a dedicated global team of approximately 55,000 associates, process expertise and advanced technologies, our solutions and services digitally transform our clients’ operations to enhance customer experiences, improve performance, increase efficiencies and reduce costs. We drive progress in every process for our client including disbursing approximately $100 billion in government payments annually, enabling 2.3 billion customer service interactions annually, empowering millions of employees through HR services every year and processing nearly 13 million tolling transactions every day. Learn more at www.conduent.com

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 36,834
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aligned-energy.jpeg
Aligned Data Centers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conduent.jpeg
Conduent
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aligned Data Centers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Conduent
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aligned Data Centers in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Conduent has 640.74% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Aligned Data Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aligned Data Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Conduent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conduent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aligned-energy.jpeg
Aligned Data Centers
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Motivation: Surveillance
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conduent.jpeg
Conduent
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Espionage (F5 source code theft), Financial gain (Conduent breach), Activism (hacktivist attacks on critical infrastructure)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Aligned Data Centers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conduent company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Conduent company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Aligned Data Centers company.

In the current year, Conduent company has reported more cyber incidents than Aligned Data Centers company.

Conduent company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Aligned Data Centers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Conduent company and Aligned Data Centers company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Conduent company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Aligned Data Centers company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Aligned Data Centers company nor Conduent company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aligned Data Centers nor Conduent holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aligned Data Centers company nor Conduent company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Conduent company employs more people globally than Aligned Data Centers company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Aligned Data Centers nor Conduent holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aligned Data Centers nor Conduent holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aligned Data Centers nor Conduent holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aligned Data Centers nor Conduent holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aligned Data Centers nor Conduent holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aligned Data Centers nor Conduent holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A weakness has been identified in codingWithElias School Management System up to f1ac334bfd89ae9067cc14dea12ec6ff3f078c01. Affected is an unknown function of the file /student-view.php of the component Edit Student Info Page. This manipulation of the argument First Name causes cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. Other parameters might be affected as well. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

By providing a command-line argument starting with a semi-colon ; to an API endpoint created by the EnhancedCommandExecutor class of the HexStrike AI MCP server, the resultant composed command is executed directly in the context of the MCP server’s normal privilege; typically, this is root. There is no attempt to sanitize these arguments in the default configuration of this MCP server at the affected version (as of commit 2f3a5512 in September of 2025).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

A weakness has been identified in winston-dsouza Ecommerce-Website up to 87734c043269baac0b4cfe9664784462138b1b2e. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /includes/header_menu.php of the component GET Parameter Handler. Executing manipulation of the argument Error can lead to cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product implements a rolling release for ongoing delivery, which means version information for affected or updated releases is unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Qualitor 8.20/8.24. Affected by this vulnerability is the function eval of the file /html/st/stdeslocamento/request/getResumo.php. Performing manipulation of the argument passageiros results in code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Scada-LTS up to 2.7.8.1. Affected is the function Common.getHomeDir of the file br/org/scadabr/vo/exporter/ZIPProjectManager.java of the component Project Import. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X