Comparison Overview
ALiA BioTech

ALiA BioTech
10-14 Kwei Tei Street, New Territories , Hong Kong , 000000, HK
Last Update: 30/03/2026
The company was created in December 2012 from a core team of founders with entrepreneurial spirits and cross-functional backgrounds in business, biotechnology, advanced micromachining & microfluidic Lab On Chip (LOC) platform. Their backgrounds and experiences formed th...

Olympus Corporation
Nishi-shinjuku 2-3-1 Shinjuku Monolith, Shinjuku-ku, JP
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Olympus is passionate about creating customer-driven solutions for the medical industry. For more than 100 years, Olympus has focused on making people’s lives healthier, safer and more fulfilling by helping detect, prevent, and treat disease, furthering scientific resea...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ALiA BioTech







Olympus Corporation






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ALiA BioTech in 2026.
Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Olympus Corporation in 2026.
Incident History - ALiA BioTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ALiA BioTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Olympus Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Olympus Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ALiA BioTech

Olympus Corporation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.