Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage ProductionAlfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production
VS
Grupo BimboGrupo Bimbo
Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production

Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production

Rudeboksvägen 1, Lund, 226 55, SE

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile

For us, food and drinks are more than just products, but experiences that can make life better. Our innovative equipment enables gentle and sustainable production of a wide range of foods: meat, seafood, vegetables, oils, fats and proteins, dairy products, soups and sau...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Bimbo

Grupo Bimbo

MX

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://grupobimbo.com
797/1000Fair

Grupo Bimbo es la empresa líder en panificación y un jugador relevante en snacks. Hornea +9,000 productos, distribuyéndolos a través de +3.5 millones de puntos de venta con +54,000 rutas. Grupo Bimbo tiene +153,000 colaboradores, +1,500 centros de ventas estratégicame...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:45,806
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production

Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Bimbo

Grupo Bimbo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Bimbo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Bimbo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Bimbo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production

Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Bimbo

Grupo Bimbo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production company and Grupo Bimbo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production and Grupo Bimbo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production and Grupo Bimbo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production or Grupo Bimbo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production or Grupo Bimbo ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production and Grupo Bimbo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Alfa Laval - Food & Beverage Production and Grupo Bimbo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1