Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Alfa Laval - Beer ProductionAlfa Laval - Beer Production
VS
Caterpillar Inc.Caterpillar Inc.
Alfa Laval - Beer Production

Alfa Laval - Beer Production

Rudeboksvägen 1, Lund, 22655, SE

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

Alfa Laval’s proven brewing solutions, from individual components and process modules to turnkey projects, along with our brewery expertise and knowhow, will help commercial and craft breweries boost yields, use less energy and water, reduce waste and produce remarkable...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Caterpillar Inc.

Caterpillar Inc.

Irving, Texas, US

Last Update: 28/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.caterpillar.com
831/1000Good

For 100 years, we’ve been helping customers build a better, more sustainable world. Our innovative products and services, backed by our global dealer network, provide exceptional value that helps customers succeed. With 2024 sales and revenues of $64.8 billion, Caterp...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:61,410
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Alfa Laval - Beer Production

Alfa Laval - Beer Production

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Caterpillar Inc.

Caterpillar Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alfa Laval - Beer Production in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caterpillar Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Alfa Laval - Beer Production (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alfa Laval - Beer Production cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Caterpillar Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caterpillar Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Alfa Laval - Beer Production

Alfa Laval - Beer Production

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Caterpillar Inc.

Caterpillar Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production and Caterpillar Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production and Caterpillar Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Alfa Laval - Beer Production or Caterpillar Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Alfa Laval - Beer Production or Caterpillar Inc. ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production and Caterpillar Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Alfa Laval - Beer Production and Caterpillar Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2