Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Alexianer Service GmbHAlexianer Service GmbH
VS
ProvidenceProvidence
Alexianer Service GmbH

Alexianer Service GmbH

Große Hamburger Straße, Berlin, undefined, 10115, DE

Last Update: 26/01/2026

View Profile

Als zentraler Servicepartner für den Alexianer-​Verbund kümmern wir uns um das gesamte Aufgabenspektrum des Personalmanagements und des Finanz-​ und Rechnungswesens und betreuen somit mehr als 6000 Mitarbeitende.

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:24
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Providence

Providence

US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.providence.org
741/1000Moderate

Every day, 119,000 compassionate caregivers serve patients and communities through Providence St. Joseph Health, a national, Catholic, not-for-profit health system, driven by a belief that health is a human right. Rooted in the founding missions of the Sisters of Prov...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:50,207
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Alexianer Service GmbH

Alexianer Service GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Providence

Providence

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alexianer Service GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Providence in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Alexianer Service GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alexianer Service GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Providence (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Providence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Alexianer Service GmbH

Alexianer Service GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Providence

Providence

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PRO8295124
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRO029090625

FAQ

Between Alexianer Service GmbH company and Providence company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH company and Providence company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH company and Providence company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH company and Providence company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH company and Providence company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH company and Providence company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH company and Providence company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH company and Providence company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH company and Providence company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH company and Providence company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH company and Providence company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH and Providence, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH and Providence, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Alexianer Service GmbH or Providence ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Alexianer Service GmbH or Providence ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH and Providence, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Alexianer Service GmbH and Providence, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1