Comparison Overview
ALDI Belgium

ALDI Belgium
Keerstraat 4, Erpe-Mere, undefined, 9420, BE
Last Update: 06/12/2025
ALDI is een van de toonaangevende retailers in België en telt ondertussen 440 Belgische winkels. Als dynamisch bedrijf zijn we dan ook voortdurend op zoek naar nieuw talent om onze positie als één van de belangrijkste spelers op het vlak van retail te versterken. Ben je...

Jumbo
Av Kennedy, Santiago, 83335, CL
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Con un tamaño promedio de 8.250 m2, Hipermercados Jumbo ofrece un variado surtido de productos, que incluye alimentos, abarrotes y una amplia gama de artículos no comestibles, como vestuario, elementos para el hogar y electrodomésticos. Además de las marcas tradicionale...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ALDI Belgium







Jumbo






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Groceries Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ALDI Belgium in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Groceries Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jumbo in 2026.
Incident History - ALDI Belgium (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ALDI Belgium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Jumbo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jumbo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ALDI Belgium

Jumbo
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.