What is the official website of ALAW ?

The official website of ALAW is https://www.alaw.net.

What is ALAW's cybersecurity risk score?

ALAW has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 703 out of 1000, indicating a Moderate security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has ALAW experienced?

According to Rankiteo, ALAW currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has ALAW been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, ALAW has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does ALAW have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, ALAW is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does ALAW have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, ALAW does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does ALAW comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, ALAW is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does ALAW have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, ALAW does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does ALAW comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, ALAW is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does ALAW have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,ALAW is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does ALAW operate in ?

ALAW operates primarily in the Law Practice industry.

How many employees does ALAW have ?

ALAW employs approximately 218 people worldwide.

Does ALAW own any subsidiaries ?

ALAW presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does ALAW have ?

ALAW's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 4,605 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for ALAW ?

ALAW is classified under the NAICS code 54111, which corresponds to Offices of Lawyers.

Does ALAW have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, ALAW does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does ALAW have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, ALAW maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/albertelli-law.

How many cybersecurity incidents has ALAW experienced ?

As of August 2, 2026, Rankiteo reports that ALAW has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does ALAW have ?

ALAW has an estimated 16,201 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has ALAW faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

ALAW

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

703

/1000

Moderate

728

/1000

Moderate

ALAW Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

alaw.net

Add Your Compliance Badge

ALAW is a national law firm delivering smart, strategic legal solutions to financial institutions across the U.S. Since 1997, we’ve grown from a boutique practice into a trusted partner for the nation’s top lenders, investors, and mortgage servicers—guiding them through every stage of the loan life cycle. Our legal services span creditors’ rights, bankruptcy, foreclosure, REO, consumer collections, attorney closings, litigation, regulatory compliance, and more. But what truly sets us apart is our commitment to innovation and client outcomes. We don’t just follow industry standards—we push them forward. ALAW continuously invests in legal talent, process optimization, and cutting-edge technology to streamline operations, reduce risk, and

ALAW A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

ALAW

ALAW CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

ALAW

Breach

5/2025

ALB109291011142...

Loading…

A.I.

ALAW Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for ALAW

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALAW in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALAW in 2026.

Incident Types ALAW vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALAW in 2026.

Incident History - ALAW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

ALAW Subsidiaries

Parent Company

ALAW

Law Practice

Website: https://www.alaw.net

Company Size: 218

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

ALAW Similar Companies

DLA Piper

dlapiper.com

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver exceptional outcomes on cross-border projects, critical transactions and high-stakes disputes. Every day we help trailblazing organizations seize business opportunities and successfully manage growth and change at speed. Through our pro bono work and community investment around the world, we help create a more just and sustainable future. Visit dlapiper.com to discover more.

Loading…

NEWS

ALAW CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

January 27, 2026 08:00 AM

Think You Are Covered? Better Read Your Cybersecurity Policy — Carefully

“Never assume your organization is fully covered. Cyber insurance policy language is fraught with exclusions, limitations of coverage,...

Read Article

December 30, 2025 08:00 AM

New York cybersecurity law seeks to limit tech products agencies can buy

A new law in New York will further restrict state and local agencies from purchasing technologies from countries that pose national security...

Read Article

December 30, 2025 08:00 AM

Sérvulo integrates TMT team and new partners

Sérvulo will integrate, as of January, a new TMT, Digital, Cybersecurity, Privacy and Data Protection team composed of six lawyers,...

Read Article

December 23, 2025 08:00 AM

Japanese government adopts new cybersecurity strategy

The new system will enable the police, the Defense Ministry and the Self-Defense Forces to work together in neutralizing critical attacks.

Read Article

December 10, 2025 08:00 AM

Class-action lawsuit against Nova Scotia Power important for accountability, says law prof

A law firm has filed a class-action lawsuit against Nova Scotia Power over a cybersecurity breach earlier this year and subsequent billing...

Read Article

December 08, 2025 08:00 AM

Parma Heights shores up its IT security following cyberattack

Like all local governments across the state, Parma Heights is currently in the process of approving cybersecurity policies.

Read Article

November 04, 2025 08:00 AM

Cybersecurity Bill threat to freedom of speech—Oppong Nkrumah

The New Patriotic Party's (NPP) Member of Parliament for Ofoase-Ayirebi, Kojo Oppong Nkrumah, has expressed concern about the draft...

Read Article

October 02, 2025 07:00 AM

Shutdown guts U.S. cybersecurity agency at perilous time

Deep staff cuts hit as ransomware hacks and Chinese cyberattacks are mounting and a law that encouraged companies to pool their cyberdefense...

Read Article

September 24, 2025 07:00 AM

Cybersecurity Information Sharing Law about to Expire, Sen. Peters Warns

A law incentivizing companies to voluntarily share cybersecurity threat indicators with the DHS Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-18556

SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects N-central: through 2026.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://uptime.n-able.com/

CVE-2026-55735

SUMMARY

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in ueberauth guardian allows an unauthenticated attacker to revoke a victim's session with a forged token. Guardian.revoke/3 in lib/guardian.ex decodes the supplied token with peek/1, which performs no signature verification (it only base64-decodes the JWT header and payload). The resulting unverified claims are forwarded directly to the configured token module's revoke callback and the implementation's on_revoke callback, a state-mutating sink. The sibling operations refresh/2 and exchange/4 both call decode_and_verify first, so the signature is checked before anything acts on the claims; revoke/3 is the only state-mutating path that acts on claims without verifying the signature. An attacker who knows or guesses a victim's identifying claim values (jti, sub) can forge a JWT carrying those claims, sign it with an arbitrary key, and submit it to any endpoint that funnels a caller-supplied token into Guardian.revoke/3 (the standard logout / session-revocation pattern). When the token module mutates state keyed by the claims (whitelist deletion or blacklist insertion, for example a GuardianDb-style store), the victim's legitimate session is evicted. This is an unauthenticated session-revocation denial of service; the attacker never needs the signing secret. This issue affects guardian: from 1.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55734

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in ueberauth guardian (Guardian.Permissions module) allows a denial of service via BEAM atom-table exhaustion. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/guardian/permissions.ex and program routines 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions!/1, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions_into_claims!/2, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':do_encode_permissions!/2. The Guardian.Permissions mixin installs a public encode_permissions!/1 function on every module that does use Guardian.Permissions. For each key of the supplied map, encode_permissions!/1 calls String.to_atom(to_string(k)) before any validation runs. The integer-value clause of do_encode_permissions!/2 then short-circuits straight to encoding without validating the key against the configured permission set, so a key with an integer value is interned as a fresh atom with no exception raised. Atoms are never garbage collected and the BEAM atom table is a fixed-size resource (default roughly 1,048,576 entries), so each unique attacker-chosen key permanently consumes one slot. An attacker who can influence a permission map that reaches encode_permissions!/1 (for example a permissions map read from a request body and passed into token issuance via encode_permissions_into_claims!/2) can mint an unbounded number of atoms and exhaust the atom table, crashing the entire BEAM node and every service running on it. The sibling decode_permissions/1 is not affected because it skips keys absent from the configured permission set. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55733

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-controlled binary input. Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding encodes permission scopes by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. When encode/3 in lib/guardian/permissions/atom_encoding.ex is called with a list, each binary entry is handled by the encode_value/3 binary clause, which calls String.to_atom(value) with no allow-list check. The perm_set argument (the application's small, finite set of legitimate permission names) is discarded, so any external string flows straight into atom creation. This encoder is selected with use Guardian.Permissions, encoding: Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding and reached through the imported encode/3 entry point. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that funnels attacker-influenced permission scopes (from a request body, a JWT claim, or other external input) into encode/3 therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node with system_limit, taking down every application running on it. The default encoder is Guardian.Permissions.BitwiseEncoding, which is not affected. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-54894

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-influenced binary input. Guardian.Plug.Keys derives connection and session namespace keys by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. base_key/1 in lib/guardian/plug/keys.ex converts any binary into the atom :"guardian_<input>", and the derived helpers claims_key/1, resource_key/1, and token_key/1 create a second atom on top of that. key_from_other/1 likewise converts a regex-captured binary through String.to_atom/1. The public specs advertise String.t() as a valid argument, so passing a string is documented usage, and higher-level entry points such as Guardian.Plug.current_token(conn, key: key) thread the caller-supplied key straight into these functions. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that routes attacker-influenced data (a tenant identifier, header, or other request input) into a Guardian key therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node, taking down every application running on it. This issue affects guardian: from 0.1.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…