Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Albert Česká republikaAlbert Česká republika
VS
PrimarkPrimark
Albert Česká republika

Albert Česká republika

Radlická, Praha, 15800, CZ

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.albert.cz/
775/1000Fair

Jsme tu pro zákazníky už více než tři desetiletí. A pyšníme se jedním prvenstvím – na počátku 90. let jsme otevřeli historicky první novodobý supermarket v Česku. Jmenoval se Mana a zákazníky v Jihlavě poprvé přivítal 6. června 1991. Dnes je Albert známou značkou po c...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1,598
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Primark

Primark

PO BOX 644, Dublin, Dublin 1, IE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.primark.com
816/1000Good

Primark is an international fashion retailer employing more than 80,000 colleagues across 17 countries in Europe and the US. Founded in Ireland in 1969 under the Penneys brand, Primark aims to provide affordable choices for everyone, from great quality everyday essentia...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:46,236
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Albert Česká republika

Albert Česká republika

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Primark

Primark

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Albert Česká republika in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Primark in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Albert Česká republika (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Albert Česká republika cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Primark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Primark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Albert Česká republika

Albert Česká republika

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Primark

Primark

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Albert Česká republika company and Primark company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Albert Česká republika company and Primark company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Albert Česká republika company and Primark company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Albert Česká republika company and Primark company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Albert Česká republika company and Primark company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Albert Česká republika company and Primark company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Albert Česká republika company and Primark company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Albert Česká republika company and Primark company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Albert Česká republika company and Primark company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Albert Česká republika company and Primark company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Albert Česká republika company and Primark company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Albert Česká republika and Primark, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Albert Česká republika and Primark, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Albert Česká republika or Primark ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Albert Česká republika or Primark ?
Between Albert Česká republika and Primark, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Albert Česká republika and Primark, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES