Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Alamo Colleges DistrictAlamo Colleges District
VS
University of Buenos AiresUniversity of Buenos Aires
Alamo Colleges District

Alamo Colleges District

US

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.alamo.edu
645/1000Poor

For 80 years, the Alamo Colleges District has expanded access to higher education and transformed lives across Bexar County and beyond. Serving an eight-county region across Central and South Texas, the Alamo Colleges District includes five colleges—St. Philip’s Colleg...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:2,100
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
University of Buenos Aires

University of Buenos Aires

Viamonte 430 Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, AR, C1114AAD

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.uba.ar/
817/1000Good

La Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) es la universidad pública más importante de Argentina. Es reconocida por los principales rankings internacionales como la mejor universidad de Iberoamérica. Actualmente, ocupa el puesto Nº 67 en el Ranking QS global. Su modelo de gr...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:25,525
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Alamo Colleges District

Alamo Colleges District

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Buenos Aires

University of Buenos Aires

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Alamo Colleges District has 17.65% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Buenos Aires in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Alamo Colleges District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alamo Colleges District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Buenos Aires (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Buenos Aires cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Alamo Colleges District

Alamo Colleges District

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CANALA1778262974
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LEHALASOW1775500819
University of Buenos Aires

University of Buenos Aires

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Alamo Colleges District company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Alamo Colleges District company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Alamo Colleges District company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Alamo Colleges District company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Alamo Colleges District company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Alamo Colleges District company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Alamo Colleges District company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Alamo Colleges District company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Alamo Colleges District company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Alamo Colleges District company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Alamo Colleges District company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Alamo Colleges District and University of Buenos Aires, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Alamo Colleges District and University of Buenos Aires, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Alamo Colleges District or University of Buenos Aires ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Alamo Colleges District or University of Buenos Aires ?
Between Alamo Colleges District and University of Buenos Aires, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Alamo Colleges District and University of Buenos Aires, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1