Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Alacrity Solutions | Temporary HousingAlacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing
VS
Marsh RiskMarsh Risk
Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing

Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing

9725 Windermere Blvd, None, Fishers, Indiana, US, 46037

Last Update: 13/12/2025

View Profile

The Alacrity Solutions temporary dousing division is a nationwide team coordinating short and long-term temporary housing for individuals, catastrophe teams and first responders. We support commercial organizations with their corporate relocation and employee lodging ne...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:123
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Marsh Risk

Marsh Risk

1166 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, US, 10036

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.marsh.com
796/1000Fair

We help our clients and colleagues grow — and our communities thrive — by protecting and promoting possibility. We seek better ways to manage risk and define more effective paths to the right outcome. We go beyond risk to rewards for our clients, our company, our collea...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:26,578
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing

Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marsh Risk

Marsh Risk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh Risk in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marsh Risk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh Risk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing

Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Marsh Risk

Marsh Risk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing company and Marsh Risk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing company and Marsh Risk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing company and Marsh Risk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing company and Marsh Risk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing company and Marsh Risk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing company and Marsh Risk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing and Marsh Risk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing and Marsh Risk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing or Marsh Risk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing or Marsh Risk ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing and Marsh Risk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Alacrity Solutions | Temporary Housing and Marsh Risk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA