Comparison Overview

Al Rounds Studio

VS

Minneapolis Institute of Art

Al Rounds Studio

undefined, South Jordan, Utah, 84095, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alrounds.com

Al Rounds' transparent watercolors register a beautiful familiarity with the world we all love. They carry us over a distance of miles and years, which speak of history revisited and of lives well-lived. Scouring back roads and country lanes, searching for the past, Al Rounds continues to capture a particular reverence for the pride of a place. Travel provides an ongoing source of inspiration for Al. Some of his favorite findings are in upstate New York, with its rural integrity and four-season beauty; in England, with its meandering, damp, cobblestone streets; and in his native Utah, where pioneer history still crowds the fence lines and farmsteads of every town.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Minneapolis Institute of Art

2400 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis, 55404, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://new.artsmia.org

The Minneapolis Institute of Art (Mia) enriches the community by collecting, preserving, and making accessible outstanding works of art from the world’s diverse cultures. Mia's permanent collection has grown from 800 works of art to almost 100,000 objects. The collection includes world-famous works that embody the highest levels of artistic achievement, spanning five thousand years and representing the world's diverse cultures across all continents. Mia has seven curatorial areas: Arts of Africa & the Americas; Contemporary Art; Decorative Arts, Textiles & Sculpture; Asian Art; Paintings; Photography and New Media; and Prints and Drawings.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 333
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/al-rounds-studio.jpeg
Al Rounds Studio
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artsmia.jpeg
Minneapolis Institute of Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Al Rounds Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Minneapolis Institute of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Al Rounds Studio in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minneapolis Institute of Art in 2026.

Incident History — Al Rounds Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Al Rounds Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Minneapolis Institute of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minneapolis Institute of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/al-rounds-studio.jpeg
Al Rounds Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/artsmia.jpeg
Minneapolis Institute of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Al Rounds Studio company and Minneapolis Institute of Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Minneapolis Institute of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Al Rounds Studio company.

In the current year, Minneapolis Institute of Art company and Al Rounds Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Minneapolis Institute of Art company nor Al Rounds Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Minneapolis Institute of Art company nor Al Rounds Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Minneapolis Institute of Art company nor Al Rounds Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Al Rounds Studio company nor Minneapolis Institute of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Minneapolis Institute of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Al Rounds Studio company nor Minneapolis Institute of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Minneapolis Institute of Art company employs more people globally than Al Rounds Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Minneapolis Institute of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Minneapolis Institute of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Minneapolis Institute of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Minneapolis Institute of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Minneapolis Institute of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Minneapolis Institute of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References