Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
AkzoNobel

AkzoNobel Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

akzonobel.com

Since 1792, we’ve been supplying the innovative paints and coatings that help to color people’s lives and protect what matters most. Our world class portfolio of brands – including Dulux, International, Sikkens and Interpon – is trusted by customers around the globe. We’re active in more than 150 countries and use our expertise to sustain and enhance everyday life. Because we believe every surface is an opportunity. It’s what you’d expect from a pioneering and long-established paints company that’s dedicated to providing sustainable solutions and preserving the best of what we have today – while creating an even better tomorrow. Let’s paint the future together.


AkzoNobel A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

AkzoNobel
Company Information
Website:http://www.akzonobel.com
Employees number:31,151
Number of followers:911,509
NAICS:325
Industry Type:Chemical Manufacturing
Homepage:akzonobel.com
AkzoNobel Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 0 and 549
logo
AkzoNobelChemical Manufacturing
Updated:
01/04/2026
318/1000
Critical
C
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
AkzoNobel Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
AkzoNobelChemical Manufacturing
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

AkzoNobel
AkzoNobelCritical
Current Score
318C (CRITICAL)
01000
3 incidents
-191.5 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
364Before Incident
MAY 2026
344Before Incident
APRIL 2026
318Before Incident
MARCH 2026
521Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Mar 2026AkzoNobel
Namibia Airports Company, Instituto de Previsión Social, AkzoNobel, OMAX Autos and Monmouth University: Ransomware roundup: March 2026

March 2026 Ransomware Surge: Critical Infrastructure Under Fire

308After Incident
CRITICAL-213
AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452
March 2026 Ransomware Surge: Critical Infrastructure Under Fire March 2026 marked a sharp escalation in ransomware activity, with 780 attacks recorded a 13% increase from February and the second-highest monthly total since February 2025. The surge was driven by targeted campaigns against critical sectors, with state-sponsored and financially motivated threat actors prioritizing high-impact disruptions. ### Key Trends & Sector Impacts - Utilities Under Siege: The utility sector saw a staggering 630% spike, with 22 attacks in March (up from just 3 in February). Sixteen countries were targeted, including six U.S. utility companies, as attackers sought to maximize operational chaos. - Manufacturing & Government Hit Hard: Attacks on manufacturers rose 36%, while government entities faced a 30% increase, reflecting a broader shift toward high-value, high-disruption targets. - Healthcare & Education: Healthcare attacks declined 15%, though six incidents were confirmed across six countries, including Germany, the U.S., and Japan. The education sector remained stable, with 18 attacks (up from 17 in February), including a four-day shutdown at a UK school. ### Ransomware Gangs & Data Theft - Top Threat Actors: Qilin (140 attacks), Akira (80), and The Gentlemen (68) led the month, with Qilin and The Gentlemen also responsible for the most confirmed breaches (7 and 5, respectively). - Massive Data Exfiltration: Over 242 TB of data was stolen, with PEAR’s attack on Monmouth University alone exposing 16 TB. A new group, AiLock, claimed the largest single haul (43 TB), including 129 GB from England Hockey. ### Geographic Hotspots - U.S. Remains Prime Target: The U.S. accounted for 375 attacks (48% of the total), followed by France (32), and Germany, the UK, and Canada (26 each). - Europe’s Rising Threat: France saw a 113% surge, while the UK (+86%) and Germany (+73%) also experienced sharp increases. In contrast, attacks declined in Canada (-21%), India (-40%), and Brazil (-42%). ### Confirmed vs. Unconfirmed Attacks - 55 attacks were confirmed in March, with businesses (33), government (10), healthcare (6), and education (6) making up the bulk. - Unconfirmed attacks (725) followed a similar distribution, though businesses bore the brunt (654 incidents). Many organizations remain silent, either due to non-disclosure policies or delayed breach reporting laws. ### Notable Incidents - Critical Infrastructure: The City of Minot’s (U.S.) water treatment plant was breached, though operations remained unaffected. In Germany, Fernheizwerk Neukölln AG (a heating plant) suffered disruptions to accounting and communications. - Government & Healthcare: Paraguay’s IPS (2 TB stolen), Namibia’s airports, and Spain’s Puerto de Vigo were among confirmed government breaches. In healthcare, Aroostook Mental Health Services (U.S.) refused to pay a ransom, while Japan’s Shiraume Toyooka Hospital was hit by NetRunnerPR. - Manufacturing Disruptions: AkzoNobel (U.S.), LISI Group (France), and OMAX Autos (India) were among the 12 confirmed manufacturing victims, with some facing shipping delays and operational halts. The March 2026 surge underscores a strategic shift toward critical infrastructure and high-value sectors, with ransomware gangs leveraging data theft, operational disruption, and public exposure as primary tactics. As confirmation lags continue, the true scale of the month’s attacks may grow in the coming weeks.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gainOperational disruptionData theft
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 242 TBFour-day shutdown (UK school)Shipping delays (manufacturing)Disruptions to accounting and communications (Fernheizwerk Neukölln AG)Operational halts (manufacturing)
DATA BREACH
Personally identifiable informationOperational dataSensitive business dataSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: 242 TB
FEBRUARY 2026
690Before Incident
Ransomware
24 Feb 2026AkzoNobel
AkzoNobel: Anubis ransomware claims responsibility for AkzoNobel network breach

Anubis Ransomware Gang Claims 170GB Data Theft from AkzoNobel in February Breach

520After Incident
CRITICAL-170
AKZ1772649747
Anubis Ransomware Gang Claims 170GB Data Theft from AkzoNobel in February Breach In December 2024, the Anubis ransomware operation emerged as a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) group, and in February 2025, it breached Dutch paint manufacturer AkzoNobel, exfiltrating approximately 170,000 files totaling 170GB of sensitive data. The stolen material includes confidential client agreements, employee contact details, private emails, passport scans, and technical documents. AkzoNobel, a global company with 35,000 employees and brands like Dulux and Sikkens, confirmed the incident at one of its U.S. sites, stating the breach had been contained with limited impact. The attack occurred on February 24, when the threat actor FulcrumSec exploited the React2Shell vulnerability in an unpatched React frontend application to gain access to AkzoNobel’s AWS infrastructure. The company has not disclosed whether it is negotiating with the attackers. Anubis has previously deployed a data wiper capable of permanently destroying files, adding to the severity of its attacks. Meanwhile, Iranian threat group Dust Specter has been linked to a separate campaign, spoofing Iraq’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs to target Iraqi government officials with new malware strains SplitDrop, TwinTask, TwinTalk, and GhostForm as part of an AI-powered intrusion operation first detected in January. The breach highlights ongoing risks from unpatched vulnerabilities and the evolving tactics of ransomware groups, including the use of destructive payloads alongside data exfiltration.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Data exfiltration and ransom demand
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 170GB (170,000 files)Systems Affected: AWS infrastructureOperational Impact: Limited impact (contained)Identity Theft Risk: High (passport scans, employee contact details)
DATA BREACH
Confidential client agreementsEmployee contact detailsPrivate emailsPassport scansTechnical documentsNumber Of Records Exposed: 170,000 filesSensitivity Of Data: HighData Exfiltration: YesEmployee contact detailsPassport scans
JANUARY 2026
689Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
687Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
685Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
683Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
681Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
679Before Incident
JULY 2025
677Before Incident
DECEMBER 2024
785Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Dec 2024AkzoNobel
AkzoNobel: Paint maker giant AkzoNobel confirms cyberattack on U.S. site

AkzoNobel Cyberattack by Anubis Ransomware Gang

659After Incident
CRITICAL-126
AKZ1772583818
AkzoNobel Confirms Cyberattack on U.S. Site as Anubis Ransomware Gang Leaks Stolen Data Dutch multinational paint and coatings giant AkzoNobel has confirmed a cybersecurity breach at one of its U.S. sites, following a data leak by the Anubis ransomware gang. The company stated that the incident was contained and limited to the affected location, with no broader impact on its global operations. In a statement to BleepingComputer, AkzoNobel acknowledged the breach, noting that it is notifying impacted parties and collaborating with authorities. The company, which employs 35,000 people and generates over $12 billion in annual revenue, owns well-known brands such as Dulux, Sikkens, International, and Interpon. The Anubis ransomware group claimed responsibility for the attack, alleging it exfiltrated 170GB of data nearly 170,000 files from AkzoNobel. Leaked samples on the gang’s dark web site include confidential client agreements, internal emails, passport scans, technical specifications, and material testing documents. The full dataset has not yet been released, and AkzoNobel has not disclosed whether it engaged with the attackers. Anubis, a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) operation, emerged in December 2024 and gained traction after launching an affiliate program on the RAMP cybercrime forum in February 2025. The group offers affiliates 80% of ransom payments and has since expanded its tactics, including a data-wiping tool introduced in June 2025 to prevent file recovery. The breach marks another high-profile attack by the increasingly active ransomware group.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gain (ransom demand), data exfiltration
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 170GB (nearly 170,000 files)Systems Affected: Limited to one U.S. siteOperational Impact: Contained to affected location, no broader impact on global operationsIdentity Theft Risk: High (passport scans exposed)
DATA BREACH
Confidential client agreementsInternal emailsPassport scansTechnical specificationsMaterial testing documentsNumber Of Records Exposed: Nearly 170,000 filesSensitivity Of Data: High (PII, confidential business documents)Data Exfiltration: Yes (170GB exfiltrated)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (passport scans)

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for AkzoNobel ?
?
What was AkzoNobel's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was AkzoNobel's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was AkzoNobel's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was AkzoNobel's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was AkzoNobel's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was AkzoNobel's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was AkzoNobel's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was AkzoNobel's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was AkzoNobel's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was AkzoNobel's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was AkzoNobel's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on AkzoNobel's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with AkzoNobel ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view AkzoNobel's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?