Comparison Overview

AkzoNobel

VS

Eastman

AkzoNobel

Christian Neefestraat 2, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, NL, 1077 WW
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.akzonobel.com

Since 1792, we’ve been supplying the innovative paints and coatings that help to color people’s lives and protect what matters most. Our world class portfolio of brands – including Dulux, International, Sikkens and Interpon – is trusted by customers around the globe. We’re active in more than 150 countries and use our expertise to sustain and enhance everyday life. Because we believe every surface is an opportunity. It’s what you’d expect from a pioneering and long-established paints company that’s dedicated to providing sustainable solutions and preserving the best of what we have today – while creating an even better tomorrow. Let’s paint the future together.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 31,151
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Eastman

200 South Wilcox Drive, Kingsport, Tennessee, US, 37662
Last Update: 2026-03-27
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eastman.com

Founded in 1920, Eastman is a global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of products found in items people use every day. With the purpose of enhancing the quality of life in a material way, Eastman works with customers to deliver innovative products and solutions while maintaining a commitment to safety and sustainability. The company’s innovation-driven growth model takes advantage of world-class technology platforms, deep customer engagement, and differentiated application development to grow its leading positions in attractive end markets such as transportation, building and construction, and consumables. As a globally inclusive company, Eastman employs approximately 14,000 people around the world and serves customers in more than 100 countries. The company had 2024 revenue of approximately $9.4 billion and is headquartered in Kingsport, Tennessee, USA.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 10,838
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akzonobel.jpeg
AkzoNobel
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eastman.jpeg
Eastman
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AkzoNobel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eastman
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

AkzoNobel has 25.09% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eastman in 2026.

Incident History — AkzoNobel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AkzoNobel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eastman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eastman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akzonobel.jpeg
AkzoNobel
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain, Operational disruption, Data theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploitation of unpatched vulnerability (React2Shell)
Motivation: Data exfiltration and ransom demand
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain (ransom demand), data exfiltration
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eastman.jpeg
Eastman
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Eastman company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AkzoNobel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AkzoNobel company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Eastman company has not reported any.

In the current year, AkzoNobel company has reported more cyber incidents than Eastman company.

AkzoNobel company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Eastman company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Eastman company nor AkzoNobel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Eastman company nor AkzoNobel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AkzoNobel company nor Eastman company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AkzoNobel nor Eastman holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AkzoNobel company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Eastman company.

AkzoNobel company employs more people globally than Eastman company, reflecting its scale as a Chemical Manufacturing.

Neither AkzoNobel nor Eastman holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AkzoNobel nor Eastman holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AkzoNobel nor Eastman holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AkzoNobel nor Eastman holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AkzoNobel nor Eastman holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AkzoNobel nor Eastman holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References