Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Akutafdelingen GødstrupAkutafdelingen Gødstrup
VS
ClarianeClariane
Akutafdelingen Gødstrup

Akutafdelingen Gødstrup

Hospitalsparken 15, Herning, Midtjylland, DK, 7400

Last Update: 14/02/2026

View Profile

Akutafdelingen på Regionshospitalet Gødstrup har ca 200 medarbejdere og er den akutte indgang til hospitalet for borgere i det midt- og vestjyske. Da Regionshopitalet Gødstrup er et akuthospital spiller Akutafdelingen en vigtig rolle i alle akutte situationer, både nå...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Clariane

Clariane

N/A

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.clariane.com
766/1000Fair

A purpose-driven company, Clariane is the leading European community for care in times of vulnerability.  Our Group’s purpose “To take care of each person’s humanity in times of vulnerability” is inspired by our three core values: trust, responsibility and initiative. ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:14,135
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Akutafdelingen Gødstrup

Akutafdelingen Gødstrup

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Clariane

Clariane

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Akutafdelingen Gødstrup in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clariane in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Akutafdelingen Gødstrup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Akutafdelingen Gødstrup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Clariane (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clariane cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Akutafdelingen Gødstrup

Akutafdelingen Gødstrup

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Clariane

Clariane

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup company and Clariane company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup company and Clariane company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup company and Clariane company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup company and Clariane company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup company and Clariane company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup company and Clariane company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup company and Clariane company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup company and Clariane company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup company and Clariane company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup company and Clariane company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup company and Clariane company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup and Clariane, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup and Clariane, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Akutafdelingen Gødstrup or Clariane ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Akutafdelingen Gødstrup or Clariane ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup and Clariane, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Akutafdelingen Gødstrup and Clariane, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93436
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to properly clean up decode-side metadata for rejected inference requests in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Remote attackers can submit requests with max_tokens=0 to exhaust decode-worker memory without bound until the worker restarts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93435
SUMMARY

redis-parser through 3.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the RESP protocol parser that allows malicious Redis endpoints to crash the client process through unbounded recursion on nested arrays. Attackers can send crafted RESP byte streams with repeated array headers that exhaust the V8 call stack, causing an uncaught RangeError that terminates the Node.js process without triggering error handling callbacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-87701
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Azure Cosmos DB allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-85917
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-85889
SUMMARY

Missing authentication for critical function in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9