Comparison Overview
Aktor Group

Aktor Group
Attica Greece, Athens, GR
Last Update: 03/01/2026
AKTOR Group of Companies is a leading market player in Southeast Europe, leveraging 70 years of experience to implement large-scale technical projects, and strategically invests in sectors such as green energy, real estate, PPPs, and facilities management

Anadolu Group
Anadolu Grubu, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Mahallesi, Balkan Caddesi No. 58 Buyaka E Blok Tepeüstü, Ümraniye, ISTANBUL, Türkiye, TR, 34771
Last Update: 02/09/2026
We maintain our activities in 8 industries (retail, soft drinks, beer, agriculture, automotive, stationery, energy and health) and in 20 countries with more than 80 companies, approximately 100 production facilities, 6 R&D centers and 100,000 employees. Our Group, which...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Aktor Group







Anadolu Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Holding Companies Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aktor Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Holding Companies Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Anadolu Group in 2026.
Incident History - Aktor Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aktor Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Anadolu Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Anadolu Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Aktor Group

Anadolu Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.