Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ak GıdaAk Gıda
VS
PT SMART TbkPT SMART Tbk
Ak Gıda

Ak Gıda

Maltepe Altayçeşme Mah. Çamlı Sok. No:21, Istanbul, İstanbul, 34843, TR

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.akgida.com.tr
753/1000Fair

Turkey’s biggest dairy product company Ak Gıda, was established in August 1996. Since then, it has played a critical role in the development of packaged dairy industry in Turkey. Sakarya (Pamukova) facility was established in 1998 to generate glocal way of working by in...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:864
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PT SMART Tbk

PT SMART Tbk

Jl. M.H. Thamrin No. 51, Jakarta, 10350, ID

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.smart-tbk.com/
787/1000Fair

PT SMART Tbk (SMART) / Sinar Mas Agribusiness and Food adalah salah satu perusahaan publik produk konsumen berbasis kelapa sawit yang terintegrasi dan terkemuka di Indonesia yang berkomitmen pada produksi minyak sawit yang berkelanjutan. Perkebunan kelapa sawit SMART m...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:13,045
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ak Gıda

Ak Gıda

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PT SMART Tbk

PT SMART Tbk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ak Gıda in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT SMART Tbk in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ak Gıda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ak Gıda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PT SMART Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT SMART Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ak Gıda

Ak Gıda

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PT SMART Tbk

PT SMART Tbk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ak Gıda company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ak Gıda company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ak Gıda company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ak Gıda company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ak Gıda company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ak Gıda company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ak Gıda company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ak Gıda company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ak Gıda company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ak Gıda company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ak Gıda company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ak Gıda and PT SMART Tbk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ak Gıda and PT SMART Tbk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ak Gıda or PT SMART Tbk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ak Gıda or PT SMART Tbk ?
Between Ak Gıda and PT SMART Tbk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ak Gıda and PT SMART Tbk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1