Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ak GıdaAk Gıda
VS
SearaSeara
Ak Gıda

Ak Gıda

Maltepe Altayçeşme Mah. Çamlı Sok. No:21, Istanbul, İstanbul, 34843, TR

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.akgida.com.tr
753/1000Fair

Turkey’s biggest dairy product company Ak Gıda, was established in August 1996. Since then, it has played a critical role in the development of packaged dairy industry in Turkey. Sakarya (Pamukova) facility was established in 1998 to generate glocal way of working by in...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:864
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Seara

Seara

Avenida Marginal Direita do Tietê 500, São Paulo, SP, BR, 05118100

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.seara.com.br
786/1000Fair

Presente há mais de 65 anos nos lares brasileiros, a Seara tem um dos portfólios mais diversificados do setor de alimentos - com opções que vão de proteína animal (frango e suínos) a pratos prontos, margarinas, pizzas, frios, lanches prontos, embutidos e proteína vegeta...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:22,151
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ak Gıda

Ak Gıda

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Seara

Seara

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ak Gıda in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seara in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ak Gıda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ak Gıda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Seara (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seara cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ak Gıda

Ak Gıda

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Seara

Seara

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ak Gıda company and Seara company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ak Gıda company and Seara company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ak Gıda company and Seara company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ak Gıda company and Seara company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ak Gıda company and Seara company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ak Gıda company and Seara company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ak Gıda company and Seara company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ak Gıda company and Seara company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ak Gıda company and Seara company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ak Gıda company and Seara company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ak Gıda company and Seara company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ak Gıda and Seara, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ak Gıda and Seara, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ak Gıda or Seara ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ak Gıda or Seara ?
Between Ak Gıda and Seara, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ak Gıda and Seara, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8