Comparison Overview

Austin Independent School District

VS

Orange County Public Schools

Austin Independent School District

4000 S I H 35, Austin, Texas, US, 78704
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.austinisd.org

Austin ISD is a diverse community of more than 10,000 employees, and we recognize that nothing is more essential to a great education system than innovative, talented, passionate educators. Whether you’re a recent graduate or an experienced professional seeking a new career opportunity, AISD has a home for you at one of our 116 diverse, incredible campuses. We serve more than 73,000 students, and integral to that service are our employees. From teachers and administrators to support and maintenance staff, everyone is part of the AISD family. If you want to make a difference in the lives of Central Texas students, if you want to help shape new initiatives and collaborate with your peers to increase student achievement, then Austin ISD wants to hear from you! Please visit www.austinisd.org to learn more about what AISD has to offer.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 11,122
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Orange County Public Schools

445 W. Amelia St., Orlando, Florida, US, 32801
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ocps.net

Orange County Public Schools is recognized as one of the top urban school districts in the nation – the 8th largest school district in America (4th in Florida) with 210 traditional schools, approximately 206,000 students and over 24,000 employees. OCPS students enjoy equity and access to a wide variety of educational opportunities, including magnet programs with specialized curriculum from Kindergarten to 12th grade. Offerings include aviation and aerospace, laser photonics, agriscience, theater and performing arts, International Baccalaureate, international studies, law and finance, engineering, science and technology, foreign language, criminal justice, medical technology, veterinary science and other specialties. OCPS is also known for encouraging students to pursue college credits through Advanced Placement courses. In fact, OCPS high school graduates pass AP exams at a higher rate than students in Massachusetts, the highest scoring state in America. Career and technical education programs are infused in middle and high school curriculum, where students can explore career options, earn industry certifications and even receive an AA degree when they graduate. Every year, more than 100 graduates from OCPS high schools are accepted into top-20 colleges and universities around the country, as well as U.S. service academies. The district also boasts a 97.9% graduate rate among its 20 traditional high schools. By 2020, every OCPS student had a laptop or digital device as a part of an aggressive and innovative digital learning program. The Center for Digital Education and National School Boards Association ranks OCPS among the top 10 on its annual Digital School Districts Survey. Currently, every secondary student has a laptop. OCPS celebrated its 150th anniversary in December 2019. Thanks to Orange County voters and taxpayers, 50 new schools have been built and more than 120 school construction projects completed since 2003.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 18,312
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aisd.jpeg
Austin Independent School District
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange-county-public-schools.jpeg
Orange County Public Schools
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Austin Independent School District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Orange County Public Schools
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Austin Independent School District in 2025.

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orange County Public Schools in 2025.

Incident History — Austin Independent School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Austin Independent School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Orange County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aisd.jpeg
Austin Independent School District
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange-county-public-schools.jpeg
Orange County Public Schools
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Orange County Public Schools company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Austin Independent School District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Orange County Public Schools company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Austin Independent School District company.

In the current year, Orange County Public Schools company and Austin Independent School District company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Orange County Public Schools company nor Austin Independent School District company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Orange County Public Schools company nor Austin Independent School District company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Orange County Public Schools company nor Austin Independent School District company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Austin Independent School District company nor Orange County Public Schools company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Orange County Public Schools holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Austin Independent School District company nor Orange County Public Schools company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Orange County Public Schools company employs more people globally than Austin Independent School District company, reflecting its scale as a Primary and Secondary Education.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Orange County Public Schools holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Orange County Public Schools holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Orange County Public Schools holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Orange County Public Schools holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Orange County Public Schools holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Orange County Public Schools holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References