Comparison Overview

Austin Independent School District

VS

Cobb County School District

Austin Independent School District

4000 S I H 35, Austin, Texas, US, 78704
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Austin ISD is a diverse community of more than 10,000 employees, and we recognize that nothing is more essential to a great education system than innovative, talented, passionate educators. Whether you’re a recent graduate or an experienced professional seeking a new career opportunity, AISD has a home for you at one of our 116 diverse, incredible campuses. We serve more than 73,000 students, and integral to that service are our employees. From teachers and administrators to support and maintenance staff, everyone is part of the AISD family. If you want to make a difference in the lives of Central Texas students, if you want to help shape new initiatives and collaborate with your peers to increase student achievement, then Austin ISD wants to hear from you! Please visit www.austinisd.org to learn more about what AISD has to offer.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 11,122
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cobb County School District

514 Glover Street, Marietta, GA, US, 30060
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT is a public school system with administrative offices based at 514 Glover St., Marietta, GA 30060. Cobb County School District (CCSD) is the second largest school system in Georgia. CCSD is responsible for educating more than 112,000 students in a diverse, constantly changing suburban environment. CCSD is made up of 113 schools and employs over 18,000 employees, making it the largest employer in Cobb County, GA. Our mission is Creating and Supporting Pathways for Success. Our vision is One Team, One Goal: Student Success.

NAICS: 6111
NAICS Definition: Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees: 10,189
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aisd.jpeg
Austin Independent School District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cobbschools.jpeg
Cobb County School District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Austin Independent School District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cobb County School District
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Austin Independent School District in 2025.

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cobb County School District in 2025.

Incident History — Austin Independent School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Austin Independent School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cobb County School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cobb County School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aisd.jpeg
Austin Independent School District
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cobbschools.jpeg
Cobb County School District
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Austin Independent School District company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cobb County School District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cobb County School District company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Austin Independent School District company.

In the current year, Cobb County School District company and Austin Independent School District company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cobb County School District company nor Austin Independent School District company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cobb County School District company nor Austin Independent School District company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cobb County School District company nor Austin Independent School District company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Austin Independent School District company nor Cobb County School District company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Cobb County School District holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cobb County School District company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Austin Independent School District company.

Austin Independent School District company employs more people globally than Cobb County School District company, reflecting its scale as a Primary and Secondary Education.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Cobb County School District holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Cobb County School District holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Cobb County School District holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Cobb County School District holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Cobb County School District holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Austin Independent School District nor Cobb County School District holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H