Comparison Overview
airtel
airtel
Plot 16, Udyog Vihar Phase IV, Gurgaon, Haryana, IN, 122009
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Airtel was founded to provide global connectivity and unlock endless opportunities. Our organization embodies a unique blend of energy, innovation, creativity, dedication, scale, and ownership, all aimed at being limitless. At Airtel, we strive to go beyond our duties t...
AT&T
208 S. Akard Street, Dallas, 75202, US
Last Update: 17/06/2026
We understand that our customers want an easier, less complicated life. We’re using our network, labs, products, services, and people to create a world where everything works together seamlessly, and life is better as a result. How will we continue to drive for thi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
airtel
AT&T
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for airtel in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
AT&T has 654.72% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - airtel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
airtel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AT&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AT&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
airtel
AT&T
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Spinnaker is an open source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform. Prior to versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4 on their respective release lines, Kustomize bake operations allow unsafe YAML tag processing in rosco manifests. This can lead to remote code execution on rosco pods when performing Kustomize bakes. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4.
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/2d75818b85cc4c35144d5e5ed45e7340fcab5dfe
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/bbc30c9b9034a056e95f012fa1b34e9fd703cae7
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/de5a7a05af35aee19eb71d289cd0b77f67509009
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/df32d568e82519d9f3896fc9007baba0077c87fd
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/f5cec213f8cf207843ed5a6929395960a1ca094f
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2025.3.4
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2025.4.4
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2026.0.3
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2026.1.1
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2026.2.0
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/security/advisories/GHSA-p68j-q7hf-3qcp
Multiple connections to the backend using the same charging station ID are allowed, which could allow an attacker to deploy multiple instances of malicious OCPP clients to overwhelm the backend.
Previously, there was no throttling on repeated authentication attempts to the charging station backend, which could allow an attacker to execute a denial-of-service attack.
The charging station websocket endpoint accepts connections without proper authentication, which could lead to privilege escalation.
vulnerability in Drupal Commerce guest registration allows . This issue affects Commerce guest registration versions: *.*.