Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

airpay payment servicesairpay payment services
VS
TransamericaTransamerica
airpay payment services

airpay payment services

Mumbai, IN

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.airpay.co.in
699/1000Weak

With 13+ years of building for Bharat, airpay is India’s first integrated omnichannel financial services platform — now RBI-approved to power in-store, online, and cross-border collections. We’ve revolutionised access to financial services by empowering over a million ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:638
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Transamerica

Transamerica

Baltimore, Maryland, US, 21202

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.transamerica.com
743/1000Moderate

Longer lifespans are changing the way we exist. Instead of the traditional stages of learn, work, and retire, we now have the potential for a more fulfilling, multi-stage life. With this opportunity comes the need to plan for it. We enable financial professionals, broke...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:15,465
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
airpay payment services

airpay payment services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transamerica

Transamerica

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for airpay payment services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transamerica in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - airpay payment services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

airpay payment services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transamerica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transamerica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
airpay payment services

airpay payment services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AIR753072825
Transamerica

Transamerica

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TRA1043072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRA415072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRA400072625

FAQ

Between airpay payment services company and Transamerica company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between airpay payment services company and Transamerica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between airpay payment services company and Transamerica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between airpay payment services company and Transamerica company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between airpay payment services company and Transamerica company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between airpay payment services company and Transamerica company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between airpay payment services company and Transamerica company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between airpay payment services company and Transamerica company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between airpay payment services company and Transamerica company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between airpay payment services company and Transamerica company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between airpay payment services company and Transamerica company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between airpay payment services and Transamerica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between airpay payment services and Transamerica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - airpay payment services or Transamerica ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - airpay payment services or Transamerica ?
Between airpay payment services and Transamerica, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between airpay payment services and Transamerica, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3