Comparison Overview

Airbus

VS

Safran

Airbus

BP 90112, None, Blagnac Cedex, None, FR, 31703
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

Airbus pioneers sustainable aerospace for a safe and united world. The Company constantly innovates to provide efficient and technologically-advanced solutions in aerospace, defence, and connected services. In commercial aircraft, Airbus designs and manufactures modern and fuel-efficient airliners and associated services. Airbus is also a European leader in space systems, defence and security. In helicopters, Airbus provides efficient civil and military rotorcraft solutions and services worldwide.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 81,999
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Safran

2, Boulevard du général Martial Valin, Paris, FR, 75015
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Safran is an international high-technology group, operating in the aviation (propulsion, equipment and interiors), defense and space markets. Its core purpose is to contribute to a safer, more sustainable world, where air transport is more environmentally friendly, comfortable and accessible. Safran has a global presence, with 79,000 employees and holds, alone or in partnership, world or European leadership positions in its core markets.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 57,921
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airbusgroup.jpeg
Airbus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/safran.jpeg
Safran
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Airbus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Safran
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Airbus has 33.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Safran in 2025.

Incident History — Airbus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Airbus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Safran (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Safran cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airbusgroup.jpeg
Airbus
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Improper handling of null bytes in the Wing FTP Server’s web interface
Motivation: Gain complete control over the system
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/safran.jpeg
Safran
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Misconfiguration
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Airbus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Safran company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Airbus and Safran have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Airbus company has reported more cyber incidents than Safran company.

Neither Safran company nor Airbus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Safran company nor Airbus company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Safran company nor Airbus company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Airbus company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Safran company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Airbus nor Safran holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Safran company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Airbus company.

Airbus company employs more people globally than Safran company, reflecting its scale as a Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing.

Neither Airbus nor Safran holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Airbus nor Safran holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Airbus nor Safran holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Airbus nor Safran holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Airbus nor Safran holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Airbus nor Safran holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N