Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Airbus HelicoptersAirbus Helicopters
VS
Pratt & WhitneyPratt & Whitney
Airbus Helicopters

Airbus Helicopters

Aéroport International Marseille-Provence, Marignane, 13725, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile

Airbus is a leader in designing, manufacturing and delivering aerospace products, services and solutions to customers on a worldwide scale. Airbus strives to provide the most efficient helicopter solutions to its customers who serve, protect, save lives and safely carr...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:13,088
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Pratt & Whitney

Pratt & Whitney

400 Main Street, East Hartford, CT, US, 06108

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

Pratt & Whitney, an RTX business, is a global leader in propulsion systems, powering the most advanced aircraft in the world, and we are shaping the future of aviation. Our engines help connect people, grow economies and defend freedom. Our customers depend on us to get...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:29,731
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Airbus Helicopters

Airbus Helicopters

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pratt & Whitney

Pratt & Whitney

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Airbus Helicopters in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pratt & Whitney in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Airbus Helicopters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Airbus Helicopters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pratt & Whitney (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pratt & Whitney cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Airbus Helicopters

Airbus Helicopters

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Pratt & Whitney

Pratt & Whitney

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRA133082125

FAQ

Between Airbus Helicopters company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Airbus Helicopters company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Airbus Helicopters company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Airbus Helicopters company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Airbus Helicopters company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Airbus Helicopters company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Airbus Helicopters company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Airbus Helicopters company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Airbus Helicopters company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Airbus Helicopters company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Airbus Helicopters company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Airbus Helicopters and Pratt & Whitney, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Airbus Helicopters and Pratt & Whitney, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Airbus Helicopters or Pratt & Whitney ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Airbus Helicopters or Pratt & Whitney ?
Between Airbus Helicopters and Pratt & Whitney, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Airbus Helicopters and Pratt & Whitney, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA