Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity SolutionsAirbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions
VS
AselsanAselsan
Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions

Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions

5 rue des Satellites, Toulouse, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
708/1000Moderate

Airbus Space Digital addresses the growing need for Information Superiority by providing Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions. We operate the largest constellation of optical and radar Earth observation satellites commercially available today, delivering high-...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:1,000
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Aselsan

Aselsan

296. Cadde 16, Mehmet Akif Ersoy, 06200, TR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.aselsan.com/tr
795/1000Fair

ASELSAN is a company of Turkish Armed Forces Foundation, established in 1975 in order to meet the communication needs of the Turkish Armed Forces by national means. Currently ​74,20% of the shares are owned by the Foundation whereas the remaining 25,8% runs in İstanbul ...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:19,439
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions

Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aselsan

Aselsan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aselsan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aselsan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aselsan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions

Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEISPATELAIRTHAEURSKY1767888882
Aselsan

Aselsan

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ASE303061025

FAQ

Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions company and Aselsan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions company and Aselsan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions company and Aselsan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions company and Aselsan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions company and Aselsan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions company and Aselsan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions company and Aselsan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions company and Aselsan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions company and Aselsan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions company and Aselsan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions company and Aselsan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions and Aselsan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions and Aselsan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions or Aselsan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions or Aselsan ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions and Aselsan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Airbus Geospatial and Secure Connectivity Solutions and Aselsan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA