Comparison Overview
Air Systems, Inc.

Air Systems, Inc.
940 Remillard Ct, San Jose, 95122, US
Last Update: 14/02/2026
Whether building quality work environments, valuable relationships or community ties, Air Systems never cuts corners. We realize that providing solid service pays huge dividends for all involved. Our speed, flawless execution and teamwork will save you time and money, a...

ABM Industries
1 Liberty St, New York, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
ABM is one of the world’s largest providers of integrated facility, engineering, and infrastructure solutions. Every day, our over 100,000 team members deliver essential services that make spaces cleaner, safer, and efficient, enhancing the overall occupant experience. ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Air Systems, Inc.







ABM Industries






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Air Systems, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ABM Industries in 2026.
Incident History - Air Systems, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Air Systems, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ABM Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ABM Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Air Systems, Inc.

ABM Industries
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.