Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Air Liquide Engineering & ConstructionAir Liquide Engineering & Construction
VS
SikaSika
Air Liquide Engineering & Construction

Air Liquide Engineering & Construction

Olof-Palme Str. 35, Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60439, DE

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

Building Air Liquide's production units and supplying external customers with a portfolio of innovative technologies and services.

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sika

Sika

Zugerstrasse 50, Baar, Zug, CH, 6341

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.sika.com/
805/1000Good

Sika is a specialty chemicals company with a globally leading position in the development and production of systems and products for bonding, sealing, damping, reinforcing, and protection in the building sector and industrial manufacturing. Sika has subsidiaries in 102 ...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:19,107
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Air Liquide Engineering & Construction

Air Liquide Engineering & Construction

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sika

Sika

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Air Liquide Engineering & Construction in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sika in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Air Liquide Engineering & Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Air Liquide Engineering & Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sika (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sika cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Air Liquide Engineering & Construction

Air Liquide Engineering & Construction

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sika

Sika

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction company and Sika company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction company and Sika company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction company and Sika company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction company and Sika company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction company and Sika company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction company and Sika company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction company and Sika company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction company and Sika company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction company and Sika company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction company and Sika company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction company and Sika company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction and Sika, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction and Sika, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Air Liquide Engineering & Construction or Sika ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Air Liquide Engineering & Construction or Sika ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction and Sika, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Air Liquide Engineering & Construction and Sika, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA