Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS)Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS)
VS
QantasQantas
Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS)

Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS)

Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited, 16th floor, Oberoi Commerz II, International Business Park, Mumbai, 400063, IN

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aisats.in
775/1000Fair

Welcome to AISATS! As India's leading gateway services company headquartered in Mumbai and operating in Delhi, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Thiruvananthapuram, Mangaluru and Ranchi airports, we at AISATS, care for our client airlines and their passengers. Our customers know...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:10,334
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Qantas

Qantas

10 Bourke Road, Mascot, 2020, AU

Last Update: 24/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.qantas.com
100/1000Critical

We would like to acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the local lands and waterways on which we live, work and fly. We pay our respects to Elders past and present.   Spirit is everything to us, and joining the Qantas team means bringing your spirit to ours. We have...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:18,076
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS)

Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Qantas

Qantas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

Qantas has 197.03% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Qantas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Qantas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS)

Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Qantas

Qantas

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
OPTMEDQAN1784773430
🔒 Incident : Breach
LATORIQANAUSMEDOPT1790224558
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LOC1774283448

FAQ

Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) company and Qantas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) company and Qantas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) company and Qantas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) company and Qantas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) company and Qantas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) company and Qantas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) company and Qantas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) and Qantas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) and Qantas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) or Qantas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) or Qantas ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) and Qantas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Air India SATS Airport Services Private Limited (AISATS) and Qantas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8