Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AIQLABSAIQLABS
VS
BlackRockBlackRock
AIQLABS

AIQLABS

Staniewicka, Warszawa, 03-310, PL

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.aiqlabs.pl
690/1000Weak

Misją zespołu AIQlabs jest ciągłe kreowanie i wyznaczanie kierunków rozwoju narzędzi finansowych w oparciu o strategie digital: big data, machine learning, data science, rozwiązania poznawcze i zaawansowane algorytmy. Nasze rozwiązania wdrażamy w służbie consumer finan...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:36
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
BlackRock

BlackRock

50 Hudson Yards, New York, NY, US, 10001

Last Update: 10/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.blackrock.com
825/1000Good

BlackRock is a global asset manager and technology provider dedicated to helping more and more people experience financial well-being. We help millions of people invest to build savings that serve them throughout their lives. We always start with our clients’ needs a...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:32,259
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AIQLABS

AIQLABS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BlackRock

BlackRock

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AIQLABS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BlackRock in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AIQLABS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AIQLABS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BlackRock (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BlackRock cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AIQLABS

AIQLABS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AIQ2492024110225
BlackRock

BlackRock

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BLA01216223

FAQ

Between AIQLABS company and BlackRock company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AIQLABS company and BlackRock company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AIQLABS company and BlackRock company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AIQLABS company and BlackRock company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AIQLABS company and BlackRock company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AIQLABS company and BlackRock company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AIQLABS company and BlackRock company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AIQLABS company and BlackRock company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AIQLABS company and BlackRock company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AIQLABS company and BlackRock company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AIQLABS company and BlackRock company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AIQLABS and BlackRock, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AIQLABS and BlackRock, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AIQLABS or BlackRock ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AIQLABS or BlackRock ?
Between AIQLABS and BlackRock, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AIQLABS and BlackRock, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2