Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AIG FAC DeskAIG FAC Desk
VS
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)
AIG FAC Desk

AIG FAC Desk

N/A

Last Update: 26/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://aigfacdesklatam.com/
752/1000Fair

The AIG FAC Desk drives business forward. We offer capacity through assumed facultative reinsurance to support our reinsurance brokers, cedents and clients in securing what matters the most. Our global footprint combined with our regional and local market knowledge, bac...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Prudential Tower, Jakarta, 12910, ID

Last Update: 04/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.prudential.co.id
777/1000Fair

Listening. Understanding. Delivering. At Prudential Indonesia we deliver excellence by consistently innovating, creating new opportunities and growing our business to cater all of our customers'​ needs. With a vision of becoming truly world class, Prudential Indonesia...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:11,936
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AIG FAC Desk

AIG FAC Desk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AIG FAC Desk in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AIG FAC Desk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AIG FAC Desk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AIG FAC Desk

AIG FAC Desk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AIG FAC Desk company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AIG FAC Desk company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AIG FAC Desk company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AIG FAC Desk company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AIG FAC Desk company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AIG FAC Desk company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AIG FAC Desk company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AIG FAC Desk company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AIG FAC Desk company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AIG FAC Desk company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AIG FAC Desk company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AIG FAC Desk and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AIG FAC Desk and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AIG FAC Desk or Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AIG FAC Desk or Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) ?
Between AIG FAC Desk and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AIG FAC Desk and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94094
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in OpenClaw up to 2026.9.5. Affected is the function createCanvasHostHandler of the file extensions/canvas/src/host/server.ts of the component Canvas Host Route. Executing a manipulation can lead to denial of service. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. Fix suggestion's "streaming/size-limit" was never shipped - latest 2026.9.5 still buffers the whole file via readFile() (src/canvas/serve.runtime.ts:17,114), unlike the sibling WS path which caps at 64KB. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-20
UPDATED
Date2026-09-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-94093
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in DLR-RM stable-baselines3 up to 2.9.0. This affects the function PPO.load/load_replay_buffer/VecNormalize.load of the file save_util.py. Such manipulation leads to deserialization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. In v2.9.0 the PyTorch tensor load path is hardened (weights_only=True), but that hardening was later reverted on master via PR #1913 "Hotfix: revert loading with weights_only=True" [blocked] to fix PyTorch 1.13 compat - so even the one "safe" path is inconsistent across versions. #2281 was closed as a duplicate of #1831 since both are unsafe pickle deserialization - but #1831's fix (PR #41) only gated the Hugging Face Hub loader in the separate huggingface_sb3 package. This finding covers the core stable_baselines3 load APIs (PPO.load, load_replay_buffer, VecNormalize.load), which have no safe mode or gate and remained exploitable in v2.9.0 until the outstanding hardening (PR #2264) ships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-20
UPDATED
Date2026-09-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-94092
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in dmlc dgl up to 2.1.0. This impacts the function load_info/_read_torch_data of the file utils.py. Performing a manipulation of the argument path results in deserialization. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-20
UPDATED
Date2026-09-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94091
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in piskvorky gensim up to 4.4.0. The impacted element is the function Load of the file gensim/utils.py of the component Model Loader. This manipulation of the argument fname causes deserialization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Maintainer closed #3663 same-day with no comment, PR, or fix; repo's last push (2025-11-01) predates the report, so the unsafe pickle.load in SaveLoad.load remains unguarded at develop HEAD.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-20
UPDATED
Date2026-09-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94090
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in JusticeRage Manalyze 1.0.0. The affected element is the function PE::_parse_debug of the file manape/pe.cpp of the component PE Parser. The manipulation of the argument misc.Length results in integer underflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The patch is identified as 3e299685759f4f767088871de58c5d07f98ee382. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-20
UPDATED
Date2026-09-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8