Comparison Overview
AIA

AIA
AIA Central, Central, N/A, HK
Last Update: 07/10/2026
AIA Group Limited and its subsidiaries (collectively “AIA” or the “Group”) comprise the largest independent publicly listed pan-Asian life insurance group. It has a presence in 18 markets – wholly-owned branches and subsidiaries in Mainland China, Hong Kong SAR(1), Thai...

Seguros SURA
Edificio Suramericana Carrera 64 B 49 A 30, Medellín, Antioquia, CO
Last Update: 03/09/2026
SURA es una compañía que integra en diferentes empresas soluciones en seguros y seguridad social. Su marca se presenta a los clientes como Seguros SURA, ARL SURA y EPS SURA. Existen otras marcas y empresas, especialmente de prestación de servicios, que hacen parte de la...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AIA







Seguros SURA






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AIA in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Seguros SURA in 2026.
Incident History - AIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Seguros SURA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Seguros SURA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AIA

Seguros SURA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.