Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AIA TaiwanAIA Taiwan
VS
AssurantAssurant
AIA Taiwan

AIA Taiwan

N/A

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

友邦保險控股有限公司及其附屬公司(統稱「友邦保險」或「本集團」)是最大的泛亞地區獨立上市人壽保險集團,覆蓋18個市場,包括在中國內地、香港特別行政區、泰國、新加坡、馬來西亞、澳洲、柬埔寨、印尼、緬甸、菲律賓、南韓、斯里蘭卡、中國台灣、越南、汶萊、澳門特別行政區和新西蘭擁有全資的分公司及附屬公司,以及印度合資公司的49%權益。 友邦保險今日的業務成就可追溯至1919年逾一個世紀前於上海的發源地。按壽險保費計算,集團在亞洲(日本除外)領先同業,並於大部分市場穩佔領導地位。截至2020年12月31日,集團總資產值為3,260億美元。 友...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:111
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Assurant

Assurant

260 Interstate North Circle SE, Atlanta, 30339, US

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.assurant.com
786/1000Fair

Assurant is a leading global business services company that supports, protects, and connects major consumer purchases. A Fortune 500 company with a presence in 21 countries, Assurant supports the advancement of the connected world by partnering with the world’s leading ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:16,954
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AIA Taiwan

AIA Taiwan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Assurant

Assurant

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AIA Taiwan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Assurant in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AIA Taiwan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AIA Taiwan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Assurant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Assurant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AIA Taiwan

AIA Taiwan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Assurant

Assurant

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AIA Taiwan company and Assurant company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AIA Taiwan company and Assurant company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AIA Taiwan company and Assurant company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AIA Taiwan company and Assurant company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AIA Taiwan company and Assurant company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AIA Taiwan company and Assurant company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AIA Taiwan company and Assurant company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AIA Taiwan company and Assurant company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AIA Taiwan company and Assurant company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AIA Taiwan company and Assurant company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AIA Taiwan company and Assurant company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AIA Taiwan and Assurant, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AIA Taiwan and Assurant, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AIA Taiwan or Assurant ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AIA Taiwan or Assurant ?
Between AIA Taiwan and Assurant, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AIA Taiwan and Assurant, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89322
SUMMARY

Vault and Vault Enterprise did not consistently evaluate ACL policies against the canonical form of resource and policy names. This may allow an authenticated user with delegated permissions to bypass an explicit deny restriction and access a protected resource or assign a denied policy, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-89322) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.1.2, and Vault Enterprise 2.1.2, 1.21.12, 1.20.17, and 1.19.23.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-107314
SUMMARY

pgjdbc, the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, versions 42.7.11 through 42.7.13 enforce no restriction when the requireAuth connection property excludes all six authentication methods the driver knows, for example requireAuth=!password,!md5,!gss,!sspi,!scram-sha-256,!none. The driver then accepts any method the server asks for, including cleartext password authentication. A value without a method in it, such as requireAuth=, (a single comma), is affected the same way. An attacker positioned between the application and its server can ask for cleartext password authentication and receive the database password. A positive list such as requireAuth=scram-sha-256, and a partial exclusion such as requireAuth=!password,!md5, are enforced correctly. The property has no default value, so a deployment that does not set it is not affected. 42.7.14 fixes the problem: such a connection is refused with SQLState 08004, and a value without a method in it is rejected as invalid.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107285
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, a proxied ws request is carried through CONNECT, but NettyRequestFactory.newNettyRequest and requestUri decide whether to attach proxy authentication and an absolute-form target only from whether the URI is secure. Because ws is not marked secure, the tunneled WebSocket upgrade sent to the origin includes the proxy's Proxy-Authorization value. Basic credentials are directly recoverable and Digest responses can be replayed or cracked offline. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107284
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, WebSocketHandler.upgrade aborts a handshake whose Sec-WebSocket-Accept value is missing or invalid but continues into pipeline installation and onOpen delivery. Frames coalesced with the invalid 101 response can be decoded and delivered from a peer that did not prove the handshake, although the request future fails and the channel closes. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107283
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, Realm.Builder generates the HTTP Digest client nonce with ThreadLocalRandom rather than a cryptographically secure random source. Digest relies on an unpredictable cnonce to resist chosen-plaintext and credential precomputation attacks, so an observer able to infer generator state can reduce the protection of the authentication exchange. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2