Comparison Overview
AgriTecno | Ajinomoto Group

AgriTecno | Ajinomoto Group
Paseo de Ruzafa, 20, Esc.1 – 4º 46002 , Valencia, 46002 , ES
Last Update: 19/03/2026
At AgriTecno, we drive sustainable agriculture forward with advanced biostimulants and plant nutrition solutions. Backed by over 20 years of expertise and part of the Ajinomoto Group, we combine science, technology, and agronomic knowledge to help farmers boost crop he...

Agilent Technologies
5301 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Santa Clara, 95051, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Agilent customers are finding new ways to treat cancer, ensure food, water, air, and medicine quality and safety, discover new drug treatments, research infectious diseases, and create alternative energy solutions for a greener planet. From start to finish, we have them...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AgriTecno | Ajinomoto Group







Agilent Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AgriTecno | Ajinomoto Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Agilent Technologies in 2026.
Incident History - AgriTecno | Ajinomoto Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AgriTecno | Ajinomoto Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Agilent Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Agilent Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AgriTecno | Ajinomoto Group

Agilent Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.
The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.
Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.
The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.