Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Agilent Dako Pathology SolutionsAgilent Dako Pathology Solutions
VS
ICON plcICON plc
Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions

Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions

5301 Stevens Creek Blvd, Santa Clara, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.agilent.com
754/1000Fair

Agilent is a global leader in life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets providing laboratories worldwide with instruments, services, consumables, applications, and expertise, enabling customers to gain the insights they seek. Agilent's expertise and trust...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ICON plc

ICON plc

ICON plc, South County Business Park, Leopardstown, Dublin, IE, D18 X5R3

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.iconplc.com
797/1000Fair

Since our foundation in Dublin, Ireland in 1990, our mission has been to help our clients to accelerate the development of drugs and devices that save lives and improve quality of life. We do this by delivering best in class information, solutions and performance, with ...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:35,356
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions

Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ICON plc

ICON plc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICON plc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ICON plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICON plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions

Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ICON plc

ICON plc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions company and ICON plc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions company and ICON plc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions company and ICON plc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions company and ICON plc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions company and ICON plc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions company and ICON plc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions company and ICON plc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions company and ICON plc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions company and ICON plc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions company and ICON plc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions company and ICON plc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions and ICON plc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions and ICON plc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions or ICON plc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions or ICON plc ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions and ICON plc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Agilent Dako Pathology Solutions and ICON plc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9